What LCOE Shows, and What It Leaves Out

Levelized cost of energy (LCOE) converts a project's discounted costs and generation into one cost per unit of electricity. It is useful for a like-for-like cost comparison. It is not the full investment decision.

The formula

LCOE = NPV(total costs) / NPV(total generation)

The numerator can include capital cost, operating cost, fuel, decommissioning, and other submitted costs. The denominator is the discounted electricity generated over the same period.

Inputs that need a source

  • Capital cost and construction schedule
  • Operating, maintenance, and fuel costs
  • Capacity factor and degradation
  • Project life and discount rate
  • Decommissioning cost and residual value treatment

A calculator result inherits the quality of these assumptions. Keep the source date and basis next to each input.

Where LCOE helps

  • Compare cost assumptions for projects with the same output boundary.
  • Show which inputs move the result under sensitivity tests.
  • Make financing and generation assumptions explicit.
  • Identify differences that need a separate operating or revenue analysis.

What LCOE does not show

  • The time and location value of generated electricity
  • Revenue, curtailment, congestion, or capacity payments unless modeled separately
  • Interconnection timing and network-upgrade risk
  • Contract terms, taxes, ownership structure, or counterparty credit
  • Charging cost and round-trip efficiency for storage

The GreenCIO calculator excludes battery storage because a plain LCOE model without charging cost and round-trip efficiency would produce a misleading result.

Run a submitted-assumption model

The public calculator shows the formula, editable inputs, source basis for presets, and an annual cost breakdown.

Open LCOE calculator

Use LCOE with the missing constraints

Compare LCOE under the same method, then review revenue, schedule, grid, contract, and financing risks separately. A lower LCOE can support a decision. It cannot make the decision by itself.

More Insights

Sustainability

How to Review Water Risk for an AI Data Center

A site-diligence checklist for water sources, cooling design, permits, consumption, and operating limits.

AI Architecture

Why AI Analysis Still Needs Explicit Human Approval

How specialist analysis, review records, approval authority, and external action stay separate.

Technical

Reduce Agent Context Cost by Loading Tools on Demand

A method for measuring tool-schema overhead and loading only the instructions a task needs.

Industry

What Tapestry Can and Cannot Tell a Data Center Investor

What the public Tapestry and PJM record establishes, and what site power diligence still requires.

Investment

How to Use Prediction-Market Odds Without Treating Them as Facts

A review method for contract terms, liquidity, timestamps, resolution risk, and source reporting.

Compliance

What the EU AI Act Says About Model Energy Use

A correction on general-purpose model documentation, energy estimates, scope, and application dates.

AI Architecture

Why Infrastructure Review Uses Specialist Lenses

How GreenCIO routes a question, records its sources, and leaves trade-offs with the human reviewer.

Sustainability

When Carbon-Aware Scheduling Helps, and When It Does Not

How to review movable workloads, grid data, deadlines, baselines, and reporting before claiming a saving.

Technical

How a News URL Becomes a Feed Record

The bounded extraction, scoring, validation, and storage path behind each submitted source URL.

Investment

How to Review Power Risk in AI Data Center Investments

A source-based framework for power delivery, upgrades, tariffs, cooling, and schedule risk.

Finance

Who Finances Hyperscale Data Centers? A Diligence Guide

Review the contracts, funding layers, and operating dependencies behind a hyperscale project.

Sustainability

A Practical Sustainability Screen for AI Infrastructure

A review checklist for workload energy, power sources, cooling, water, hardware use, and evidence.