How to Review Water Risk for an AI Data Center
A site-diligence checklist for water sources, cooling design, permits, consumption, and operating limits.
The feed does not build itself. An operator or authenticated service submits a URL. The ingestion path extracts a bounded record, validates it, and writes it to the configured feed store.
GREENCIO_RUNTIME_PROFILE=development npm run url-news "https://example.com/article"The explicit development profile permits the labeled local fallback when Google Cloud Storage (GCS) is unavailable. Preview, staging, and production do not use that fallback.
The extracted record retains the source URL, source name, publication date when available, and discovery time. A generated summary does not replace the source link.
The write path validates record shape and bounded values before persistence. It merges records by stable identity so a retry does not need to create a duplicate article.
Configured environments write the canonical feed tofeed/latest.json in GCS. The write uses the current object generation to detect a concurrent replacement. If a strict environment cannot read or write GCS, the operation fails. It does not silently write a local production feed.
Extraction can misread a page, and a generated summary can omit context. Before publication, review the title, source date, quantities, attribution, and any statement about future plans. A relevance score measures keyword fit. It is not source quality or factual confidence.
Browse the public intelligence feed or inspect the repository.
A site-diligence checklist for water sources, cooling design, permits, consumption, and operating limits.
How specialist analysis, review records, approval authority, and external action stay separate.
A method for measuring tool-schema overhead and loading only the instructions a task needs.
What the public Tapestry and PJM record establishes, and what site power diligence still requires.
A review method for contract terms, liquidity, timestamps, resolution risk, and source reporting.
A correction on general-purpose model documentation, energy estimates, scope, and application dates.
How GreenCIO routes a question, records its sources, and leaves trade-offs with the human reviewer.
How LCOE normalizes project cost, which assumptions drive it, and which risks need separate review.
How to review movable workloads, grid data, deadlines, baselines, and reporting before claiming a saving.
A source-based framework for power delivery, upgrades, tariffs, cooling, and schedule risk.
Review the contracts, funding layers, and operating dependencies behind a hyperscale project.
A review checklist for workload energy, power sources, cooling, water, hardware use, and evidence.